<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BIODIESEL NEWS- BIODIESEL ETHANOL BIODIESEL PLANTS BIOENERGY BIODIESEL JATROPHA BIODIESEL &#187; WIND POWER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biodiesel-news.com/index.php/tag/wind-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biodiesel-news.com</link>
	<description>BIODIESEL NEWS BIODIESEL INFORMATION BIODIESEL PLANTS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:39:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s &#8216;audacious&#8217; wind-energy investment</title>
		<link>http://biodiesel-news.com/index.php/2010/10/13/googles-audacious-wind-energy-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://biodiesel-news.com/index.php/2010/10/13/googles-audacious-wind-energy-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WIND POWER]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biodiesel-news.com/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is sinking $5 billion into an undersea power cable that could revolutionize offshore wind energy&#8230; or go bust. Google has thrown its clout and money into an &#8220;audacious&#8221; plan to build a 350-mile-long undersea transmission cable capable of connecting giant offshore wind installations along the Atlantic seaboard to the main electrical grid. The line [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google is sinking $5 billion into an undersea power cable that could revolutionize offshore wind energy&#8230; or go bust.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Google has thrown its clout and money into an &#8220;audacious&#8221; plan to build a 350-mile-long undersea transmission cable capable of connecting giant offshore wind installations along the Atlantic seaboard to the main electrical grid. The line &#8220;will serve as a clean-energy superhighway, with on-ramps for wind farms&#8221; from New York to Virginia, says Rick Needham, Google&#8217;s green energy czar. But is the search giant making a good business decision, investing $5 billion for a nearly 40-percent stake in the project?<span id="more-675"></span></strong></p>
<p>A smart move in all respects: This is a big win for Google and wind energy, says Seth Weintraub in Fortune. The proposed transmission &#8220;backbone&#8221; will make it feasible for wind farms to sprout up along the windy Atlantic Coast. And Google not only makes a smart investment and helps assure reliable energy for its growing needs, it also boosts its &#8220;environmental image&#8221; in a way &#8220;much more valuable than any profits they&#8217;ll receive.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Google invests in East Coast offshore wind energy&#8221;</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s gambling, again: These kinds of &#8220;kooky&#8221; investments are part of Google&#8217;s &#8220;iconoclastic approach to business,&#8221; says the AP&#8217;s Michael Liedtke in The Salt Lake Tribune. And as with its self-driving cars, financing wind energy could either pay off as a brilliant long-term business decision — after all, Google &#8220;sucks up massive amounts of energy&#8221; — or &#8220;it could turn out to be a total bust.&#8221; That&#8217;s what investors signed on for.<br />
&#8220;Making sense of Google&#8217;s seemingly kooky moves&#8221;</p>
<p>Putting up money is the easy part: &#8220;We applaud Google&#8217;s investment,&#8221; says Henry Blodget in Business Insider, but don&#8217;t expect it to pay off anytime soon. The nation&#8217;s first offshore wind farm, Cape Wind off Nantucket Sound, just now got federal approval &#8220;after ten years — TEN YEARS — of fighting off&#8221; lawsuits from &#8220;rich people&#8221; who didn&#8217;t want their ocean view obstructed by windmills. So Google, &#8220;brace yourselves for one hell of a fight.&#8221;</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/biodiesel_news">http://twitter.com/biodiesel_news</a></p>
<p>SOURCE: THE WEEK</p>
<p>more news BIODIESEL NEWS</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biodiesel.com.ar">http://www.biodiesel.com.ar</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biodiesel-news.com/index.php/2010/10/13/googles-audacious-wind-energy-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Jobs: Towards Decent work in a Sustainable, Low-Carbon World</title>
		<link>http://biodiesel-news.com/index.php/2006/03/17/green-jobs-towards-decent-work-in-a-sustainable-low-carbon-world/</link>
		<comments>http://biodiesel-news.com/index.php/2006/03/17/green-jobs-towards-decent-work-in-a-sustainable-low-carbon-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN JOBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar-energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUSTAINABLE ENERGY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIND POWER]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biodiesel-news.com/index.php/2006/03/17/green-jobs-towards-decent-work-in-a-sustainable-low-carbon-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuente: UNEP. ( Download PDF )]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuente: UNEP.<br />
( <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biodiesel.com.ar/download/UNEPGreenJobs_report08.pdf" target="_blank">Download PDF</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://biodiesel-news.com/index.php/2006/03/17/green-jobs-towards-decent-work-in-a-sustainable-low-carbon-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

